Maucini v. Haymes’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1970
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Straffus v. Barclay · Evans v. Jeffrey · Continental Fire & Casualty Ins. Corp. v. Whitlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““State of Texas “County of Smith “Before Me, the undersigned Notary Public, on this day personally appeared J. W. Durrett, who, on oath states: “I am J. W. Durrett, dba Tyler Service Parts Company, defendant in the above numbered and entitled cause, and the foregoing plea and every statement, allegation and denial thereof are true and correct. “/s/ J. W. Durrett “J. W. Durrett “Sworn To and Subscribed before me, the undersigned Notary Public, by the said J. W. Durrett on this the 14th day of November, 1957, to certify which witness my hand and seal of office. “/s/ Bess Cash “Notary Public In and For Smith “(Seal) County, Texas””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.