State v. Burse’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Whalen · State v. Withrow · State v. Presberry · State v. Mann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must look to the elements of the crime and consider each in turn,[ is] required to take the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and to grant the State all reasonable inferences from the evidence. [This Court] disregard^] contrary inferences, unless they are such a natural and logical extension of the evidence that a reasonable juror would be unable to disregard them. Taking the evidence in this light, [the Court] consid-eres] whether a reasonable juror could find each of the elements beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hagensieker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.