Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 SW3D 314 - State v. Ondo

State v. Ondo’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Mallett · State v. Agee · State v. Norville · State v. Belton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he cases indicate that what is sufficient restraint is highly dependent on the particular facts and circumstances, but the key factor [the Missouri Supreme Court] has identified is whether the evidence showed 'actual restraint of the person of the defendant,' or otherwise showed control of the defendant's movements by the officer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Once the arrest has been fully effectuated a defendant should be considered to be in custody. Where a court finds that the arrest has been completed before the actions constituting 'resisting' have occurred, there cannot be a valid conviction for resisting arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the arrest must be in progress when the 'resistance' occurs. Once the arrest has been fully effectuated a defendant should be considered to be in custody.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.