Blocker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 18th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on State v. Ross · State v. Cullen · Ex Parte Wheeler · Castro v. State · Allen Ex Rel. B.A. v. Albin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court shall file its findings of fact and conclusions of law within twenty days after a timely request is filed. The court shall cause a copy of its findings and conclusions to be mailed to each party in the suit. If the court fails to file timely findings of fact and conclusions of law, the party making the request shall, within thirty days after filing the original request, file with the clerk and serve on all other parties in accordance with Rule 21a a “Notice of Past Due Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law” which shall be immediately called to the attention of the court by the clerk. Such notice shall state the date the original request was filed and the date the findings and conclusions were due. Upon filing this notice, the time for the court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law is extended to forty days from the date the original request was filed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scheideman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.