Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 S.W.3d 793 - Bailey v. Bailey

Bailey v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller · Yeoman v. Com., Health Policy Bd. · Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Golightly · Sherfey v. Sherfey · Eaton v. Trautwein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A family court operating as a finder of fact has extremely broad discretion with respect to testimony presented, and may choose to believe or disbelieve any part of it. ... [A] reviewing court is not permitted to substitute its judgment for that of the family court, unless its findings are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A separation agreement which was originally determined not to be unconscionable may later be modified if due to a change in circumstances the agreement has become unconscionable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is entitled to make its own decisions regarding the demeanor and truthfulness of witnesses”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.