Peloquin v. Hibner’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1989
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co. · Schoette v. Drake · Rainer v. Schulte · State ex rel. Traister v. Mahoney · Hull v. Mallory
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An arrest is the taking, seizing or detaining of the person of another either by touching or putting hands on him, or by any act which indicates an intention to take him into custody and subjects the person arrested to the actual control and will of the person making the arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.