231 Wis. 2d 58 - State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 121 Wis. 2d 389 - State v. Dunn · 168 Wis. 2d 486 - State v. Sauceda · 85 Wis. 2d 722 - Cranmore v. State · 80 Wis. 2d 332 - Wittke v. State Ex Rel. Smith · State v. Labrum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The crime of robbery occurs when an individual takes property from another with the intent to steal and uses or threatens the use of imminent force against the individual with the intent to overcome any physical resistance to the taking or carrying away of the property. See § 943.32(1), STATS. This crime is classified as a felony. If an individual does not use or threaten the use of force when stealing the property, then his or her actions constitute the misdemeanor offense of theft. See § 943.20, STATS. Johnson, 231 Wis. 2d at 61 n.1. The Johnson court stated that the threat of use of force element in robbery "does not require express threats of bodily harm." Id. at 69 . Rather, the element is met "if the taking of the property [is] attended with such circumstances of terror, or such threatening by menace, word, or gesture as in common experience is likely to create an apprehension of danger and induce a [person] to part with property for [his or her] safety." Id. (alteration in original; citation omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“circumstances of terror, or such threatening by menace, word, or gesture as in common experience is likely to create an apprehension of danger and induce a [person] to part with property for [his or her] safety.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“both courts are in the same position when conducting their reviews.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.