Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 A.2d 79 - State v. Heald

State v. Heald’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bradford v. Davis · McLendon v. State · Carey v. Bourque-Lanigan Post No. 5 · Borneman v. Milliken

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “motions for new trials in criminal cases *** shall be filed during the term at which verdict is rendered, but in no case later than 30 days after verdict [is] rendered' as meaning that the motion must be filed during the term and in the event the term continues for more than 30 days, then within 30 days after the rendition of the verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.