Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 CALRPTR3D 503 - People v. Guzman

People v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mincey v. Arizona · United States v. Knights · 134 S. Ct. 2473 - Riley v. Cal. United States · 25 Cal. 3d 640 - People v. Blair · People v. Sheena K.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “specific consent of the authorized possessor of the device.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “physical interaction or electronic communication”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.