Benaroya v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · 14 Cal. 3d 473 - Freeman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · 124 Cal. App. 4th 547 - Dream Theater, Inc. v. Dream Theater · Sandquist v. Lebo Automotive, Inc. · 127 Cal. App. 4th 262 - ALLIANCE TITLE COMPANY, INC. v. Boucher
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'There are circumstances in which nonsignatories to an agreement containing an arbitration clause can be compelled to arbitrate under that agreement. As one authority has stated, there are six theories by which a nonsignatory may be bound to arbitrate: "(a) incorporation by reference; (b) assumption; (c) agency; (d) veil-piercing or alter ego; (e) estoppel; and (f) third-party beneficiary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'Whether an arbitration agreement is binding on a third party (e.g., a nonsignatory) is a question of law subject to de novo review.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.