Pollio v. Planning Commission’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 district · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc. (1995), Bauer v. Waste Management of Connecticut, Inc. (1996)
2 district · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Peck v. Jacquemin · Aaron v. Conservation Commission · United Illuminating Co. v. Groppo · Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/Litton · Dart & Bogue Co. v. Slosberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] presumption of validity is accorded to municipal ordinances. Every intendment is to be made in favor of the validity of the ordinance, and it is the duty of the court to sustain the ordinance unless its invalidity is established beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"We presume that laws are enacted in view of existing relevant statutes and that the legislature intended them to be read together so as to constitute one consistent body of law. Department of Administrative Services v. Employees' Review Board, 226 Conn. 670 , 679 , 628 A.2d 957 (1933)." Pollis v. Planning Commission, 232 Conn. 44 , 55 , 652 A.2d 1026 (1995).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]echnical amendments are not generally intended to effect substantive changes in the law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.