State v. Groomes’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
114 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp. (1998), State v. Hines (1998)
114 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Alabama v. White · United Transportation Union v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder both the federal and state constitutions, police may detain an individual for investigative purposes if there is a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the individual is engaged or about to engage in criminal activity .”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[r]easonable suspicion is a less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity or content than that required to establish probable cause, but also in the sense that reasonable suspicion can arise from information that is less reliable to show probable cause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The officers then took the defendant to the police station where Hurley again read him the Miranda rights, this time from a waiver form. After reading the rights form, the defendant initialed the waivers and signed the form at the bottom. He stated that he was willing to tell the officers about other burglaries that he had committed, and agreed to show the officers the locations of these burglaries. Hurley took a number of reports that had been filed concerning recent burglaries in the Westville area, and went with Pachesa to drive the defendant around the neighborhood.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.