Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 CONN 707 - State v. Morales

State v. Morales’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

196
cited by 196 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

190 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 196 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Illinois v. Fisher (2004), State v. Brown (1995)

190 state decisions — followed in 10 states

6501995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Mathews v. Eldridge · Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Leon · California v. Trombetta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prior to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Youngblood, [our courts] consistently had applied a balancing test in determining whether the failure of the police to preserve potentially useful evidence had deprived a criminal defendant of due process of law. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[f]airness dictates that when a person's liberty is at stake, the sole fact of whether the police or another state official acted in good or bad faith in failing to preserve evidence cannot be determinative of whether the criminal defendant received due process of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “there may well be cases in which the defendant is unable to prove that the State acted in bad faith but in which the loss or destruction of evidence is nonetheless so critical to the defense as to make a criminal trial fundamentally unfair.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.