Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 F.2d 107 - Edwards v. Bromberg

Edwards v. Bromberg’s Empirical Analysis

232 F.2d 107 · 1956

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Luman v. Commissioner (1982), Warfield v. Byron (2006)

26 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

3201956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Heininger · Stone v. White · Alison v. United States · 36 Cal. 2d 373 - People v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a word of general and broad connotation, intended to cover and covering any criminal appropriation of another's property to the use of the taker, particularly including theft by swindling, false pretenses, and any other form of guile.”
    24 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not compensated for by insurance or otherwise.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he exact nature of the crime, whether larceny or embezzlement, of obtaining money under false pretenses, swindling or other wrongful deprivations of the property of another, is of little importance so long as it amounts to theft.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.