Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 F.2d 211 - Harold O. McLain Etc. v. John R. Jarecki, Individually, Etc.

Harold O. McLain Etc. v. John R. Jarecki, Individually, Etc.’s Empirical Analysis

232 F.2d 211 · 1956

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1986
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1986

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501956196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 811

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Holmes' Estate · Orvis v. Higgins · Lehman v. Commissioner · Cole's Estate v. Commissioner · Newberry's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Newberry's Estate John J. Newberry Trust No. 1 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * These trusts, and the stipulated facts can also be read as articulating a donative state of mind once extant between the McLains, * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.