Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 F.2d 708

Docket No. 15774.

Klotz v. United States

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1956.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-04-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1956

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-04-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James Wilkinson, III, New Orleans, La., Hugh M. Wilkinson, Jr., New Orleans, La., for appellant.

¶2Prim B. Smith, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., George R. Blue, U. S. Atty., New Orleans, La., for appellee.

¶3Before RIVES, TUTTLE and JONES, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The appellant was adjudged guilty upon a jury’s verdict of violating Title 18 U.S.Code, § 1709,1 and was sentenced to imprisonment for six' months.

¶6*709The sole question on appeal is whether the district court erred in denying appellant’s motions for judgment of acquittal and for a new trial for the reason that the evidence was insufficient in law to support his conviction. A careful examination of the record convinces us that there was no such error, and the judgment is therefore

¶7Affirmed.

/232/f2d/708 · .json · Public domain