Radio Corp. of America v. International Standard Electric Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.2d 726 · 1956
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2009 · most notably Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp. (1974), Perma Research & Development v. Singer Co. (1976)
19 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 119 · 35 U.S.C. § 146 · 35 U.S.C. § 32
Relies on Morgan v. Daniels · Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. Etten · Sanford v. Kepner · Field v. Knowles · Woods v. Interstate Realty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Then when the question moves to the district court, while the case is heard de novo, we have the strict injunction laid down by Morgan v. Daniels . that the patent office’s finding is not to be disturbed unless there is ‘thorough conviction’ that a mistake has been made. The force of Morgan v. Daniels has been repeatedly recognized by this Court. [Footnote omitted].” Radio Corp. of America v. International Stand. E. Corp., 232 F.2d 726, 729 (C.A. 3, 1956).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The claimed invention was talked about as something to use on ships and large airplanes. Despite the obvious differences in the conditions on top of an office building and that on a moving ship at sea or in an airplane there was no experimentation done in either place.” At 731 of 232 F.2d.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.