Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 F.2d 889

Docket No. 5316.

James v. Looney

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-03-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1958

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1956-03-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Donald King, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

William C. Farmer, U.S. Atty., Topeka, Kan. and Royce D. Sickler, Asst. U.S. Atty., Wichita, Kan., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge, and HUXMAN and MURRAH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Affirmed without opinion.

/232/f2d/889 · .json · Public domain