Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 F.2d 889

Docket No. 7171.

Close v. United States

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued April 9, 1956.

Decided April 11, 1956.

Writ of Certiorari Denied June 11, 1956.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-04-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1971

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on 140 F. Supp. 373 - United States v. Bernett

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-04-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1See 76 S.Ct. 1056.

¶2Carl Close, pro se, on brief.

¶3William F. Mosner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md. (George Cochran Doub, U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., on brief), for appellee.

¶4Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and PAUL, District Judge.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for vacation of sentence made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion and appeal are entirely without merit for reasons adequately stated in the opinion of the judge below, U. S. v. Bernett, D.C., 140 F.Supp. 373.

¶7Affirmed.

/232/f2d/889 · .json · Public domain