Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 F.2d 895

Docket Nos. 12672, 12673.

Fork Junction Coal Co. v. Clark

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 1956.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-04-20

2 counsel of record

Relies on Laurence E. Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston-Pocahontas Coal Co. · Hall v. Eversole's Adm'r

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-04-20

¶1Baird & Hays, Pikeville, Ky., for appellants.

¶2C. Kilmer Combs, Prestonsburg, Ky., for appellee.

¶3Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause has been heard on the oral arguments and briefs of counsel and on the record in the case;

¶6*896And it appearing from the opinion of United States District Judge Swinford, which embraces his findings of fact and conclusions of law, that there is substantial evidence to support his findings and that the same are not clearly erroneous; and that his conclusions of law are supported by adequate authority. See Hall v. Eversole, 251 Ky. 296, 64 S.W.2d 891; Tierney Land Co. v. Kingston Pocahontas Coal Company, 241 Ky. 101, 43 S.W.2d 517.

¶7The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

/232/f2d/895 · .json · Public domain