Miguel Cruz-Navarro, Graciela Egoavil-Valenzuela, and Sergio Brian Cruz-Egoavil v. Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.3d 1024 · 2000
Citation profile
26 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Sangha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Satnam Singh-Kaur Hari Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Vargas v. U.S. Department of Immigration & Naturalization
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sendero Luminoso is a Maoist guerilla organization, founded around 1980, that opposes the current Peruvian government. Sendero Luminoso commits terrorist acts against both government officials and civilians.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(1), as amended by the transitional rules for judicial review under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not testify that he had particular political beliefs or opinions, much less political motives”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.