Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 F.3d 1042 - David Dearinger Victor Litovchenko Natalia Volkova v. Janet Reno Immigration and Naturalization Service

David Dearinger Victor Litovchenko Natalia Volkova v. Janet Reno Immigration and Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

232 F.3d 1042 · 2000

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

29 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Mohammed v. Gonzales (2005), Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft (2003)

29 federal appellate ·

620200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Cronic · Roe, Warden v. Flores-Ortega · Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Kalaw v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Hugo Castillo-Perez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here an alien is prevented from filing an appeal in an immigration proceeding due to counsel's error, the error deprives the alien of the appellate proceeding entirely.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “would have timely appealed but for [his] counsel[s'] errors,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Jimenez-Marmolejo, 104 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1996), and the Friends have certainly done that. 19 The government also argues that there must be”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.