United States v. Corey’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.3d 1166 · 2000
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Serra v. Lappin (2010), United States v. Gamez (2002)
16 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co. · Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents · John Aldens v. Maine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The United States exerts practical dominion over activities on the Yokota Air Force Base. The SOFA with Japan provides that “[wjithin the facilities and areas, the United States may take all the measures necessary for their establishment, operation, safe-guarding and control.” That broad language alone would confer upon Congress the legislative jurisdiction to prescribe and enforce the laws necessary for the management and security of the Yokota Air Force Base. But, Article XVII [of the SOFA] goes farther and explicitly grants the U.S. military the authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all persons subject to military law. Where jurisdiction is concurrent, the SOFA grants the United States the primary right to try U.S. military and civilian personnel for offenses committed solely against U.S. security, property or persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]here is no requirement that the United States be an owner, or even an occupant, so long as the land has been set aside for the use of an instrumentality of the federal government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“obviously much less serious where the interpretation arguably violating international law is urged upon [the court] by the Executive Branch of our government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Arc Ecology
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.