Hamilton v. Segue Software Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.3d 473 · 2000
Citation profile
20 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Sossamon v. Lone Star (2009), Burrell v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Bottling Group, Inc. (2007)
20 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swanson · Norman v. Apache Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that there exists a genuine issue of material fact. Hamilton v. Segue Software, Inc. , 232 F.3d 473 , 477 (5th Cir. 2000).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An issue is `genuine' if the evidence is sufficient for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.