Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 F.3d 704 - John Thomas Drayden v. Theo White, Warden

John Thomas Drayden v. Theo White, Warden’s Empirical Analysis

232 F.3d 704 · 2000

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
4
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Slack v. McDaniel · Arizona v. Fulminante · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[he] inappropriately obscured the fact that his role is to vindicate the public's interest in punishing crime, not to exact revenge on behalf of an individual victim.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “had delivered exactly the same speech in the third person, it would have been proper.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “when manner-of-killing evidence strongly suggests premeditation and deliberation, that evidence is enough, by itself, to sustain a conviction for first-degree murder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.