United States v. Gerrow’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.3d 831 · 2000
Citation profile
44 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 3559 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Olano · Johnson v. United States · Green v. United States · United States of America v. Fabian Aguayo-Delgado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'there is no error, plain or otherwise, under Apprendi where the term of imprisonment is within the statutory maximum set forth in section 841(b)(1)(C).'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“and would hold as error any sentence obtained when the court utilized drug quantities in §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 841(b)(1)(B) that were not charged in the indictment and proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, regardless of the actual sentence imposed. We preserve, however, that portion of Camacho which reaffirmed the principle that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where neither the Supreme Court nor this Court has ever resolved an issue, and other circuits are split on it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.