Iraola Cia Sa v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation Jn’s Empirical Analysis
232 F.3d 854 · 2000
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably Iraola Cia Sa v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation Na Jn (2003), Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. por A. v. Lama (2011)
15 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain · Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation · United States v. Gonzales · Ankenbrandt Lr Sr v. A Richards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when Congress uses different language in similar sections, it intends different meanings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“first, to what extent a judgment rendered in the person’s absence might be prejudicial to the person or those already parties; second, the extent to which, by protective provisions in the judgment, by the shaping of relief, or other measures, the prejudice can be lessened or avoided; third, whether a judgment rendered in the person’s absence will be adequate; fourth, whether the plaintiff will have an adequate remedy if the action is dismissed for nonjoinder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that federal courts do not have diversity jurisdiction over cases where there are foreign entities on both sides of the action, without the presence of citizens of a state on both sides,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.