Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

232 F. App'x 364

Bin Lin v. Gonzales

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 12, 2007

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-07-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2011

1 federal appellate ·

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-07-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Bin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying as untimely his motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Lin, No. A70-505-315 (B.I.A. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 PETITION DENIED.

/232/fappx/364 · .json · Public domain