Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 FSUPP2D 306 - DaBronzo v. Roche Vitamins, Inc.

DaBronzo v. Roche Vitamins, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the employer’s right to control the means and manner of the worker’s performance; (2) the kind of occupation- — supervised or unsupervised; (3) skill; (4) who furnishes the equipment and workplace; (5) the length of time in which the individual has worked; (6) the method of payment; (7) the manner of termination of the work relationship; (8) whether there is annual leave; (9) whether the work is an integral part of the business of the “employer;” (10) whether the worker accrues retirement benefits; (11) whether the “employer” pays social security taxes; and (12) the intention of the parties. [Ibid.].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “there were some indicia of control or supervision by [the manufacturer], but that this supervision was limited to ensuring compliance with safety procedures, promoting efficiency, managing its budget, establishing administrative processes, and maintaining control over its premises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Plaintiff has submitted no evidence that ... [the contractor-employer] could not have employed him at another work site or in another capacity,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.