Lynch v. Amoruso’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. · Weixel v. Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a limited number of participants[,] ... only one direct victim[,] ... and "only one scheme: an attempt to steal [the victim's] property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a limited number of participants[,] ... only one direct victim[,] ... and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.