Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2009
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Joyner v. State · Owens v. State · Worthy v. State · Edwards v. State · 5 Ga. App. 367 - Walker v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'While counsel should not be permitted in argument to state facts [which are] not in evidence, it is permisssible to draw deductions from the evidence; and the fact that the deductions may be illogical, unreasonable, or even absurd, is matter for reply by adverse counsel, and not for rebuke by the court.’ ” Walker v. State, 232 Ga. 33, 36 ( 205 SE2d 260 ) (1974). This enumeration of error is without merit. 4. The appellant argues that the trial court erred by including the following sentence in its charge to the jury:”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kaufmann v. Kaufmann
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.