Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Ga. App. 630 - Jones v. State

232 Ga. App. 630 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Pardo v. State · Norris v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Determinations of witnesses’ credibility, including the accuracy of eyewitness identification, are within the jury’s exclusive province. Norris v. State, 258 Ga. 889, 890 (1) ( 376 SE2d 653 ) (1989). Our role [as an appellate court] is limited to evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, not reweighing it. Pardo v. State, 215 Ga. App. 317 (1) ( 450 SE2d 440 ) (1994).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.