Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Ga. App. 672 - Milton v. State

232 Ga. App. 672 - Milton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Davis v. State (2009), 245 Ga. App. 135 - State v. Blackwell (2000)

32 state decisions

230199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · California v. Hodari D. · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`In dealing with the failure of the state to preserve evidence which might have exonerated the defendant, a court must determine both whether the evidence was material and whether the police acted in bad faith in failing to preserve the evidence. [Cit.] To meet the standard of constitutional materiality, the evidence must possess an exculpatory value that was apparent before it was destroyed, and be of such a nature that the defendant would be unable to obtain comparable evidence by other reasonably available means. [Cit.]' (Cit.)" [Cits.] "`Unless a criminal defendant can show bad faith on the part of the police, failure to preserve potentially useful evidence does not constitute a denial of due process of law.' [Cits.]" [Cit.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In dealing with the failure of the state to preserve evidence which might have exonerated the defendant, a court must determine both whether the evidence was material and whether the police acted in bad faith in failing to preserve the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.