232 Ga. App. 680 - Supchak v. Pruitt’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 241 Ga. App. 141 - Holloman v. D. R. Horton, Inc. (1999), 249 Ga. App. 668 - White v. BDO Seidman, LLP (2001)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · 187 Ga. App. 594 - Moore v. Goldome Credit Corp. · 224 Ga. App. 137 - Goring v. Martinez · Kissun v. Humana, Inc. · 226 Ga. App. 399 - Boulware v. Quiktrip Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘If the landowner is neither the owner nor keeper, he has no duty to confine or restrain the animal. If an animal is allowed by its keeper to escape from its confinement and harm results, that damage results from the negligent confinement, not from the condition of the land. To the extent that the condition of the land made it inadequate or unsuitable for confinement, the responsibility for selecting an adequate method of confinement is upon the keeper, not upon the landowner who neither owned nor kept the animal.’ ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““In passing upon a motion for summary judgment, a finding of fact which may be inferred but is not demanded by circumstantial evidence has no probative value against positive and uncontradicted evidence that no such fact exists. When uncontradicted and unimpeached evidence is produced as to the real facts, the inference disappears, and does not create a conflict in the evidence so as to require its submission to a jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.