White v. Willard’s Empirical Analysis
1908
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 1963 · most notably Carter Oil Co. v. McQuigg (1940), Ogle v. Barker (1946)
2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Souverbye v. Arden · Shackeltow v. Sebree · Cline v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law has a regard for the relationship of the parties and the motives that are presumed to dictate such conveyances, and the degree of confidence which the parties standing in such relation, as donors and donees of valuable property, are presumed to have; and in such case the presumption of law is.that there was a delivery; and when brought in question, the 'burden is upon the grantor, or those claiming adversely to the donee or beneficiary, to show clearly that there was no delivery.” Chapin v. Nott, 203 Ill. 341 ( 67 N. E. 833 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leighton v. Leighton““In cases of voluntary settlements, the mere fact that the grantor . retains the deed in his possession is not conclusive against its validity, if there are no other circumstances besides the mere fact of his retaining it, to show that it was not intended to be absolute.” Henry v. Henry, 215 Ill. 205, 211 ( 74 N. E. 126 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Leighton v. Leighton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.