232 Ill. App. 3d 758 - Aspling v. Ferrall’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 11 U.S.C. § 554 · 11 U.S.C. § 701 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 1081 (§ 301 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on 111 Ill. 2d 229 - Purtill v. Hess · Caplin v. Marine Midland Grace Trust Co. of New York · Koch Refining v. Farmers Union Central Exchange, Inc. · S.I. Acquisition, Inc. v. Eastway Delivery Service, Inc. · St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Pepsico, Inc., Pepsico, Inc., Third-Party v. Banner Industries, Inc., Third-Party
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has the exclusive right to bring an alter ego action against corporate shareholders and fiduciaries.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.