Bryarly v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
49 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Herald Publishing Co. v. Bill (1955), Jernigan v. State (1971)
49 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New York · Acme Finance Co. v. Huse · Brindley v. Meara · Catherwood v. Morgan · Medias v. City of Indianapolis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Relief under this statute (Declaratory Judgment Act) cannot be had where another established remedy is available. It is not intended to abolish the well known causes of action, nor does it afford an additional remedy where an adequate one existed before.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.