Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Ind. 650 - Jeffers v. State

Jeffers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1979
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Peats v. State · Marshall v. State · State Ex Rel. Kaufman v. Gould · Dixon v. State · Souerdike v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It has been held that if an amendment is of the essence of the offense charged and alters the information in a material respect, or affects the substantial rights of the defendant, or if a defense under the information as originally written would not be equally available after the amendment has been made, or if any evidence the accused might have would not be equally applicable to the information as amended, the amendment is one of substance, not form, and is not permitted over objection after the defendant has entered his plea.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The court may at any time before, during or after the trial amend the indictment or affidavit in respect to any defect, imperfection or omission in form, provided no change is made in the name or identity of the defendant or defendants or of the crime sought to be charged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.