Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Kan. 124 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
4
states following
April 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently April 2014

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

701982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · State v. Gregory · State v. Sullivan & Sullivan · State v. Prince · State v. Seelke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Defendant did not testify at trial. The victim’s own testimony, however, raises a legitimate factual issue as to whether defendant had the capacity to form the specific intent requisite for kidnapping. Accordingly, we conclude the trial court erred in failing to instruct on the lesser included offense of unlawful restraint. The kidnapping conviction therefore must be reversed and remanded for new trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘The rule is well established that the duty to instruct on lesser included crimes arises only when there is evidence under which the defendant might have reasonably been convicted of the lesser offense. [Citations omitted.] Thus, if the evidence offered excludes a theory of guilt on a lesser included offense, the instruction need not be given. [Citations omitted.]’ ” 232 Kan. at 125-26 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'the taking or confining of any person, accomplished by force, threat or deception, with the intent to hold such person'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.