Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Kan. 364 - State v. Thompson

State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2006

16 state decisions

80198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin Theatres of Texas, Inc. v. Bullock · State v. Warren · State v. White & Stewart · State v. Mitchell · State v. Moody

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The granting or denial of a continuance in a criminal case is a matter which rests in the sound discretion of the trial court. Absent a showing of prejudice to the defendant, and an abuse of the court's discretion, the ruling of the trial court will not be disturbed on appeal." p. 368.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.