Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Kan. 778 - State v. Martin

State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2012

16 state decisions

1201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gustin · State v. Crozier · State v. Grimes · State v. Whorton · State v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A]ppeals on questions reserved by the prosecution will not be entertained merely to demonstrate whether or not errors have been committed by the trial court. Such questions must be of statewide interest and answers thereto must be vital to a correct and uniform administration of the criminal law. State v. Lamkin, 229 Kan. 104 , Syl. ¶ 2, 621 P.2d 995 (1981).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Appeals to the supreme court may be taken by the prosecution from cases before a district judge as a matter of right in the following cases, and no others: “(1) From an order dismissing a complaint, information or indictment; “(2) from an order arresting judgment; “(3) upon a question reserved by the prosecution; or “(4) upon an order granting a new trial in any case involving a class A or B felony.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““No case docketed either in the supreme court or the court of appeals shall be dismissed solely for the reason of having been filed in the wrong court, but shall be transferred by the supreme court to the court which the supreme court determines to have jurisdiction. Any such case shall be considered timely and properly filed in the court to which it is transferred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.