Pack v. Feuchtenberger’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2016
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Toner's Admr. v. South Covington & C. Street Railway Co. · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart's Administrator · J. W. Reccius & Bro. v. Columbia Finance & Trust Co. · Reck & Riehl v. Caulfield · Berry v. Hale
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As noted in Pack v. Feuchtenberger. [t]he notice to quit is technical, and is well understood; it fixes a time at which the tenant is bound to quit, and the landlord has a right to enter, and a time at which the rent terminates. The rights of both parties are fixed by it, and are dependent on it.... It is manifest, therefore, that when ... consequences depend upon the notice to be given, the notice should fix, with reasonable exactness, the time at which these consequences may begin to take effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shinkle v. Turner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.