State v. Peart’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1966
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mills · State v. Palmer · State v. Cook · State v. Coffil
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The question of the admissibility of the confessions addressed itself to the trial judge, and his ruling will not be disturbed unless it is clearly against the preponderance of the evidence. State v. Cook, 215 La. 163 , 39 So.2d 898 ; State v. Palmer, 227 La. 691 , 80 So.2d 374 .” State v. Peart, 232 La. 111 , 93 So.2d 920 . See, also, State v. Domino, 234 La. 950 , 102 So.2d 227 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.