Haddock v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably Fowler v. Smith (1965), Juhl v. Airington (1997)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Railways & Electric Co. v. Perkins · McIntyre v. Saltysiak · Jones v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co. · State Ex Rel. Balderston v. Hopkins · Bybee v. Shanks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““All you have really is some evidence of excessive speed or speed greater than the speed limit on the part of Mr. Stewart at certain points along the highway. I notice reference was constantly made to the fact that there was no occasion unless Mr. Stewart was engaged in racing for him to pass the other cars. ... Go out on the highway, any time you want, you see cars speeding up and going sixty to pass other cars; they’re not necessarily engaging in a race. . . . There isn’t any direct evidence that he [encouraged Hill to race]. It may be a suspicious matter. We can’t let this matter go to the Jury to speculate. . . .” 232 Md. at 143-44 , 192 A. 2d at 107-08 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.