Pearlman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably Hadder v. State (1965), Veney v. State (1968)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Redwine v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. · Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad · Neusbaum v. State · Seidman v. State · Blum v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““On motion of the defendant, the court may order the filing of a bill of particulars within such time as the court may fix. * * (emphasis supplied)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Spector v. State · Veney v. State“provided the simplified form contains the essential elements of the crime it purports to charge.” Pearlman v. State, 232 Md. 251, 257-58 , 192 A.2d 767, 771 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 943 (1964) (and cases cited therein). As stated in Neusbaum v. State, 156 Md. 149, 156 , 143 A. 872, 875 (1928),”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ayre v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.