232 Md. App. 178 - Priester v. Baltimore County’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bennett v. Spear · Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co. · Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. · Clayton v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers · Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a legislature provides an administrative remedy as the exclusive or primary means by which an aggrieved party may challenge a government action, the doctrine of administrative exhaustion requires the aggrieved party to exhaust the prescribed process of administrative remedies before seeking "any other" remedy or "invok[ing] the ordinary jurisdiction of the courts."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The exhaustion doctrine fulfills the legislature's intent of delegating a matter to an agency for initial review and decision [and] promotes the policy of allowing agencies to exercise their expertise ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an improper request for 'the courts to resolve matters ab initio that have been committed to the jurisdiction and expertise of the agency.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.