232 Md. App. 342 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Michelson v. United States · Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Bravman · Fixa v. Heilberg · Hunt v. State · Dykes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“the jury might arguably have gotten an incomplete impression of Williams'[ ] character for peacefulness....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.