232 Md. App. 489 - Brookman & Carnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[W]e agree with the State that decisions to impose sanctions for violations of the terms of the Drug Court program are not final judgments in the § 12-203 sense.... The Drug Court sanctions imposed in Ms. Brookman's and Mr. Carnes's cases do not modify their individual conditions of probation-the sanctions are elements of the overall program itself[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brookman State v. Carnes

2. “I understand that Drug Court imposes graduated sanctions for lack of compliance with program requirements, including incarceration. I have the right to request and have a formal adversarial hearing before the imposition of a sanction of incarceration or before being terminated from Drug Court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brookman State v. Carnes

3. “...if the participant is considered for the imposition of a sanction involving the loss of liberty or termination from the program, the participant shall be afforded notice, an opportunity to be heard, and the right to be represented by an attorney before the court makes its decision.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Brookman State v. Carnes