Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Mich. 345 - Schwartz v. Tuchman

Schwartz v. Tuchman’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2018

4 state decisions

101925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Exchange Bank v. McLoon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he debtor can bring the entire fund into a court and run no risk as to its proper distribution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the interests of all parties can be determined in a single suit”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.