Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 232 Mich. 620 - People v. Cords

People v. Cords’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 1950
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1950

4 state decisions

201925193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. City Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant had a right to a trial in accordance with the rules of evidence, unhampered by a circumvention thereof under statements of improper offers, followed by endeavors to get the excluded matters before the jury, and successful to a point beyond possible elimination by instructions to the jury. "We think the virus of such prejudicial matter inoculated and the prejudice thereof ran its course regardless of remedies applied.” (Italics supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.